Principles of Minimal Intervention Dentistry
In a recently published expert consensus statement on minimally invasive dentistry (MID), it’s recommended to only resort to invasive treatment strategies in two scenarios:
- If a lesion is active, cavitated and not cleansable; or
- if an occlusal micro-cavitated lesion extends deep into the dentin (to be assessed radiographically).1
In the proximal area, which is not easily visible and accessible with instruments, the extension of the lesion should be assessed with the aid of a radiograph. Whenever the core or inner third of the dentin is affected, it’s likely the lesion is cavitated, and an invasive treatment is necessary. In other cases, it’s usually possible to adopt micro-invasive treatments – such as sealing or caries infiltration – or even non-invasive strategies. Recommended non-invasive measures include professional biofilm management, topical fluoride therapy and calcium and phosphate application to aid remineralization. If treatment is required due to a defective restoration, the dental practitioner should opt for repair rather than replacement whenever possible.
2,3 When the clinical condition of the tooth is in question, or a particularly high caries risk or other factors make it necessary to replace the restoration, additional removal of tooth structure should be minimized as much as clinically possible.