December 27, 2019 |
"About half of all American adults—117 million individuals—have one or more preventable chronic diseases, many of which are related to poor quality eating patterns and physical inactivity."
Wait...half?
Admittedly a libertarian by nature, the practical reality is that there are social goods that we want to maximize as a society. Population health is one such thing, but we must keep in mind that the individual makes decisions that maximize their own individual satisfaction, NOT the satisfaction of the broader population. I have the right to eat and enjoy my potato chips and ice cream and I accept that it is not always in my best interest, depending on the amount of course.
But the thing is, it doesn't just hurt me...as a social good, it is subject to the economic principle of externalities:
“a cost or benefit not transmitted through prices that is incurred by a party who did not agree to the action causing the cost or benefit.”
Research and development is a standard example of a positive externality, air pollution of a negative externality. Now consider the challenge of dealing with obesity, a result of our eating habits which impacts population health. Obesity leads to increasing healthcare premiums and more care for a population which is increasingly developing chronic conditions.
We have setup safety nets for retirement, we tax tobacco to influence behavior, and yet we are living in an environment which encourages unhealthy eating habits and food choices.
This is where the libertarian argument falls apart, because it is not just about ruining my own health.
Where can we start?
The convenience store would sell the granola bar more quickly if their margins were higher, and people would buy the granola bar if there was an economic incentive. The granola and fruit selection at the convenience store is often $3-5 compared to $1.50 for a candy bar.
Food selection is subject to price elasticity and currently we are incentivizing poor choices.
It is sort of like offering someone $50 NOT to go to the doctor. That is an example of incentivizing a choice counter to maintaining good health and no one thinks this is a smart idea, right? In fact, in the U.S. we’ve now done the opposite. To encourage a strong relationship with your primary care physician (PCP), health plans now offer zero-deductible well visits.
So, the question is…
When will we apply this lesson to food? What is the tipping point that will force a change in our policy?
Katie Christensen is a healthcare consulting manager within the Population and Payment Solutions group of 3M Health Information Systems.
More references:
https://www.econlib.org/library/Topics/College/marketfailures.html
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2115533
https://fortune.com/2018/02/20/meat-tax-climate-change-health-us/
https://truthinitiative.org/research-resources/tobacco-prevention-efforts/importance-tobacco-taxes
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2879182/